Within this occasion, Even though the situations have been blended, almost everything else was carefully monitored for being as consistent as is possible. I feel a slight blurriness or lighting from the photo is resulting in the remaining situation to seem significantly less rounded. In fact, They're almost indistinguishable in that regard.
My ramblings are matters I've tried using or experienced. You might or might not wish to emulate them so read them with this in your mind.
I comprehend no person is most likely about to want to answer that in print and I would've asked Hodgdon right, but I get the job done with sufficient attorneys to determine what their answer is going to be.
My measured velocities had been near printed data. For lots of the cartridges I tested, W244 developed some of the increased velocities Amongst the powders detailed on Hodgdon’s Web-site, and it did this with pretty low cost weights.
You probably are far too tightly specifying (clicking too many variety bins) to get a hull/primer/shot body weight mix that Hodgdon did not examination with 244 powder.
maybe even down below the powder's least strain. An excellent example of this is the 148gr LHBWC in a very 38 Specific loaded with 3.0gr of Bullseye. This really is one of the most precise revolver loads on the planet but is usually an exceptionally dirty burner. Bullseye is a really rapidly burning powder also incorporates a minimal tension of 15K psi and since this load only creates about 10k psi, It is really like capturing dirt.
See I failed to say "optimum velocity" for the reason that there are plenty of periods when a lot less velocity is more appealing. Merely a slight alter while in the powder's melt away charge might make a notable difference in performance.
This is certainly an older thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving an old thread. Please think about creating a new thread.
I don't know about the Winchester or S&B guide no cost primers staying readily available, but Fiocchi direct cost-free can be found.
I guess that what I used to be attempting to figure out is if the posted starting up velocities for these new powders was set due to a Actual physical limitation with the powder or if it absolutely was established by a legal professional.
This is often an older thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. Please look at developing a new thread.
Posted Could 30, 2022 On five/28/2022 at 9:35 AM, Youngeyes claimed: Have you been expressing that there are scratches are in your beech face, and were more info being transferred to the primer? They look like gouges to me. Ended up there any other primers that looked this way? Did you chrono the masses? I also observed an posting about 244. Indeed, for those who glance intently at the case over the still left inside the twelve o'clock placement you can see exactly the same scratches but they're much fewer pronounced. Even though I have a chronograph, I failed to use it for this run due to the fact I used to be at a community vary and setup is often a PITA. Many thanks for posting the Handloader website link. Very delighted that their 5.five grain article corresponds perfectly with my five.4 getting. Farmer's article is exciting. I study just yesterday a few fellow who was enduring a problem which has a load he had used For several years. He abruptly started acquiring a specific model (sorry I don't recall which) display symptoms of extreme force so he despatched several of the cases to the journal author for examination.
The 244 powder clearly incorporates a slower melt away rate. You'll find not quite a few powders considerably quicker than TG. Sorry for throwing that in the way I did. Gotcha, thanks.
380 masses about 100fps speedier. I didn’t know 244 even existed! Many thanks beforehand. I've a substantial amount of TG, but will require additional powder Throughout the future thirty day period or so.
Are you chronographing your hundreds or checking out a ebook that is certainly utilizing an extended barrel than you have got for data. Its in essence a whole new improved 231, also I'm positive cheaper . Usually takes up considerably less room than 231, IRRC in all probability about the same as tightgroup.